- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
I think this is the real ticket for any party that doesn’t want to just be Republican 2.0. Just stop sucking corporate cock and service the working class. But, like, with real, actual helpful things and not just bigotry and feelings that people want to hear like the pube-lickans do.
But the DNC would rather hand their country to the fascists than allow progressive ideas to gain traction.
There’s no pressure on them to support progressive policies in a 2 party system. All they have to do is wait until Trump’s administration shits the bed and they’ll win again.
If you read that article, all of those policies are economic policies that Harris was pushing. Punishing price gouging, lowering rent and mortgages costs by incentivizing building and banning price fixing algorithms, etc.
Those races either had more effective communicators, or shittier opponents. They were democratic candidates that ran on the Democratic Party’s policies.
How on earth do you have a shittier opponent than Donald Trump?!?
Or course, being moderates, they didn’t mean a word of it.
But it does show that even feigned progressive populism brings out the voters that running to the right alienates.
Oh for fuck’s sake. Attitudes like that are why candidates don’t bother going for the left’s votes.
You can’t meet half way between “a fair world where human life has value” and "complete corporate monopolization of everything. "
The Dems made the choice to continue bending the knee to the rich instead of representing the people who elected them
Wanting leftists to support leftist policies instead of the rich is totally reasonable
I voted for Kamala who was the only correct choice but can’tblame othersfor being apathetic.
You will accept any excuse to move to the right and only the right. You already got genocide support and loved every last second of it.
Yeah, but read the article, look at the policies those people campaigned on, and google whether or not Harris also backed those economic policies. She did. She supported and ran on most of those policies.
IMHO, this was probably more of an issue around how effective the candidates, and their opponents, were at getting the policies or “vibes” in voter’s minds.
She supported and ran on most of those policies.
She ran on “don’t do anything different from Biden” and “Look! We got Cheney’s endorsement!” and “shut up, the economy’s fine!”
It’s both a policy and messaging issue. On both fronts the campaign did not take either seriously enough
Of course they were taking it seriously. You can criticise the strategy, but clearly they took it very seriously.
Yeah, just saying that the policies mentioned in the article were not what made those people win or made Harris lose. They basically had the same policies.
I disagree, from the article those candidates had more anti-corporate policies that addressed the issue of cost of living. The closest thing Harris ran on was to crack down on Price gouging, which was/is one of her most popular positions, yet she also did not campaign enough on that front and contrasted it with housing deregulation
