• Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Of course they were taking it seriously. You can criticise the strategy, but clearly they took it very seriously.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah, just saying that the policies mentioned in the article were not what made those people win or made Harris lose. They basically had the same policies.

      • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I disagree, from the article those candidates had more anti-corporate policies that addressed the issue of cost of living. The closest thing Harris ran on was to crack down on Price gouging, which was/is one of her most popular positions, yet she also did not campaign enough on that front and contrasted it with housing deregulation