• antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Dumpster diving. Doesn’t matter if it’s food or merchandise. It should be illegal to lock a dumpster or willfully destroy usable goods.

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      You’ve never had to repeatedly clean trash slurry off of a concrete slab because junkies are terrible people who have no manners. If people could be trusted to not redistribute the trash across the land I wouldn’t mind so much

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Euthanasia/medically assisted suicide.

    The cruelty to force people to stay alive while slowly dying and suffering with terminal diseases is horrible. It’s traumatic for everyone involved, and it’s pointless.

  • Femcowboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Prostitution. Keeping it illegal makes it so much worse for everyone involved except human traffickers.

  • Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Abortion. No specific circumstances needed. If a woman wants an abortion, it should be allowed. There is no one getting late term abortions that didn’t want the child and something tragic happened and now they need one.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      As a caveat to the last sentence, it’s definitely possible for women to not know they’re pregnant until very late in the process. There have even been women who only found out they were pregnant when they went into labor.

  • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    For now all I can think of are drugs (every single one, including opioids) and euthanasia (not just for terminal diseases, should be available for everyone who decides to).

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      With limits

      Fentanyl, for example, should require doctors guidance at least, and forced medical help to get off of it when you’re displaying addiction behavior.

      Euthanasia should also be legal, but with strict rules. You want to avoid someone off themselves just because they’re having a bad day

  • jerkface@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Rescuing animals who would be harmed by their owners without intervention.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Weed (not legal in all states)

    Most hallucinogens (at least for medical or supervised use)

    Being trans (lotta states trying to ban me)

    Being gay (they’re probably next)

    Abortion (many states ban this now)

    Free healthcare (not technically illegal, per se)

    Being homeless

    Polyamory (not technically illegal afaik, but there are a lot of legal benefits that married couples get which aren’t extended to polyamorous relationships due marriage being restricted to couples only)

    The list goes on because while there are many basic things that aren’t technically illegal, the system is set up in a way to fuck you because of the required profit motive behind offering basic necessities in a capitalist society.

    • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The first five you listed are all one thing: bodily autonomy. We each have the right to do to ourselves whatever the fuck we want.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Why?

        Let’s break the matter in two parts:

        if the adults involved in such a relationship are all informed and consenting, no harm is done to anyone. No one has the right to interfere or comment on those people way of life.

        If, eventually, there is the decision to have children, the chance of them growing in a dysfunctional home is as high as any other.

        The family may be unconventional but it does not imply nor it is a given it is unable to properly care for children and pass down values of good individual and social behaviour.

        • Demdaru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 minutes ago
          1. I do not agree that people in such kind of relationship are any worse for each other than in normal case. At least if they entered it knowing that it’s something that works for them. So i won’t dispute this.

          2. About children tho…isn’t it actually proven that children need designated father and mother figure? I know of few people who didn’t have father figure and they are all kinda damaged. Though probably such family could simply designate two main guardians and treat rest as close aunts and uncles…so dunno, maybe a moot point.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        polygamy and polyamoury are not the same thing. You’re welcome. I often do that with actors, thinking two different people are the same person.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Two consenting adults is fine regardless of gender, the problem with polygamy is that when you have more than 2 people in a romantic relationship, its not gonna be equal.

          Like a 3 way relationship is gonna end up with 2 of the 3 being more closer than the other, that just causes jealousy and that tends to end violently.

          Polygamy often takes the form of a person participating in several separate marriages. Like imagine children of different families sharing Parent A with other families, but with their own Parent B. But Parent A is gonna have a favorite of one of the Parent B. So the other Parent B are gonna get jealous. Its a unstable relationship.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I think there is a lot of historical evidence that dismisses your claims. Polyamory, and/or communal parenting, has existed in many forms amongst many different indigenous peoples, and it is still practiced today. There was a time in our past where children being raised by many different parents was the ‘norm’, and an argument could be made that it is a more natural form of child rearing than our ‘norm’ of monogamous parent couples.

            There is no evidence of people that practice communal or group parenting having issues with violence or jealousy, that is just your assumption. There is evidence that these kind of situations could be advantageous. The child has more people to pay attention to them and can feel a better sense of community. They are also being socialized better and are being shown a wider variety of perspectives, etc.

            I would definitely suggest you look into it for yourself, if you are curious why your assumption is wrong.

          • remon@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Like a 3 way relationship is gonna end up with 2 of the 3 being more closer than the other, that just causes jealousy and that tends to end violently.

            What are you basing this on?

          • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I disagree that it always is or will inherently become that way. Even two individuals in a relationship often do not function well when a third (a child) is introduced. leading to jealousy, abuse, neglect, etc. When forced to remain in said relationship.

  • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Sleeping in a car that you own.

    I think there should be restrictions on where to park for this, but in general people found sleeping in cars should be protected by the law against theft and harassment.

    • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Sleeping anywhere. It should be illegal to wake somebody up, unless there’s reason to believe they require medical intervention.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Restrictions on where you can park

      Nah fuck that noise. This is how you let them corral you into slums.

      Park where you want. Out front of parliament, the prime minister’s house, on the street out front a billionaires house, wherever. If they don’t like it, them they should fix it.

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Well, I mean, someone’s evil ex shouldn’t park in front of their house. And people should not park for a nap in a handicap spot. And not in the driving portion of a road, not in the breakdown lane of a major highway, not on anyone’s lawn.

        But yeah, basically any place where parking is allowed, sleeping while parked should be allowed and protected.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Camp anyplace you need to camp. Keep your car where it belongs.

          • jerkface@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            It is. It is a good place to park. That’s not what is being discussed.

            Having a place to live is an unmitigable human need. Having a car is not. A car left too long on public land should become a shelter for OTHERS.

    • WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think you have the right to do this. No one’s gonna charge your if you’re dead…

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Being illegal means you can’t have humane and stressless suicide devices available to market. Instead one has to rely on tools which are uncertain, or cause you too much stress at the end of your life. And at the same time you have to dodge the state, so you can’t just announce it and spend your last hours with your loved ones.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Many places make it illegal to allow police to intercede. In most places, the police can intervene if they believe a crime is about to be committed.

        There is a huge line between someone who is terminally ill, and wants to die on their own terms, and someone having a mental health crisis. The first should be legal, but still needs support and checking, the 2nd need immediate help.

        • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And what happens when your mental health crisis has lasted for several years, decades even? It is possible to not be terminally ill or old and still rationally decide you want to die due to chronic illness or other issues, even if your issue is purely mental illness. You should be able to die with dignity, peacefully - not after forking over a pretty sum over sketchy websites hoping to get the right peaceful pill that every government has banned or a poison + medication combo so that you’ll die puking your guts out but hopefully you won’t puke the poison out and successfully die.

          There is no help for so many people wanting to die, they’ve exhausted their options. Some are so desperate they buy what they think is a peaceful pill but is instead rat poison. Mental hospitals do not help these type of people, if these places help at all.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I know, first hand, how strong the illusion is, that depression causes. It’s like having a mountain poised to avalanche down on you. You just want to escape, even if it’s via extreme means.

            The key is that it is still an illusion. It’s a paper tiger, once you get a handle to fight it, it dissolves like mist. Most people who attempt suicide, due to mental health, are not dealing with a steady chronic condition. They are at a crisis point. If they receive appropriate help, clawing their way back is perfectly possible for most.

            There are exceptions, but they are quite rare. I would bundle them with terminal illness, though proving that is a lot harder. It’s also a balancing act between being OK with dying, and being of sound mind to make that decision.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            There is no help for so many people wanting to die, they’ve exhausted their options

            They feel like there is no help, no options, no possibilities. They feel like they’ve exhausted their options.

            To state absolutely there is no help to be had in any possible situation is just plain wrong. It does feel like that, yes, and that’s the horrible bit. Because the brain absolutely can’t not come up with anything and every option you have agency over you feel like you’ve exhausted. But also, it is a slight exaggeration to say with absolute certainty there is no help.

            And I am speaking from experience.

            But no, it’s not discounted that assisted suicide for mental illness should be completely off the table. However because of the nature of mental illness, there should definitely be checks and balances for it, otherwise half the population would kill themselves over their first heartbreak.

            • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I’ve read their stories and have my own, there is no help. Therapy, medication, mental ward visits, physical therapy, etc. don’t help. Some issues are definitely caused by society, but it is not realistically possible to change society radically enough and soon enough to help. They feel there is no help because there is indeed no help, I also hold this view for myself.

              I am not talking about someone going through a breakup reacting on impulse, I mean people who have been mentally ill for years. People with chronic conditions. People who are in pain.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I am not talking about someone going through a breakup reacting on impulse, I mean people who have been mentally ill for years. People with chronic conditions. People who are in pain.

                And very politely assumed I’m not one of those people, not presumptuous at all.

                I’ve been tossed out of an ER after I told the psychiatrist I was afraid I might hurt myself or others. Literally, verbatim (albeit in Finnish.) He said, “don’t try to make that my responsibility”. Like, fuck, that’s literally in his job description. He got a guard to escort me out. I rang a crisis holine. They hang up on me, saying I didn’t have a crisis. All this after I had waited in an empty room without food for 7 hours, waiting for that pick of a psychiatrist on call to laze back to work. And they didn’t even tell me “he won’t be in for hours”, when they knew perfectly well.

                Then another time I was denied my prescription medication while in police custody. I was kept in a cell for three days without them telling me what’s going on, how long, why, and even fucking cutting off my water at one point. A literal crime against humanity. Ate my finger open and wrote >300 words in my own blood on the walls. I got a picture of the cell somewhere. They accused me of vandalising the cell. I tried getting the video material from my time in the cell to prove their gross negligence. They “lost it”.

                My family doesn’t even contact me. Haven’t worked in several years. Had to move from school to school as a kid because of my mom, never had time to form long term relationships even though I make friends rather easily.

                A few years ago, I would’ve definitely agreed with you. I’m a stubborn person, and it FELT like I had exhausted all my options and no-one was willing to help. That’s an exaggeration of course, as is your absolute. And true, the doctors didn’t help shit, family and friends nonexistent, the one friend who I had who could’ve helped lost a daughter, so can’t really blame him for not being able to help others.

                I was genuinely considering suicide everyday, and had there been an easy way to do it, I probably would’ve. If not for nothing else, then to make every single fuck of those “not my problem” fucks feel at least a little guilty for not doing more. Like my mom. I would’ve loved to see her face when she heard I killed myself. Might sound uncaring, because you don’t understand how uncaring my mother is, and that lack of care is what I’ve been talking to her about and she just represses and outright ignores it. So having screamed about suicidal ideation to her probably would’ve made her feel at least a little bit guilty for not simply calling me to prevent me from killing myself.

                But I don’t feel like that now. Because I’m a stubborn as fuck person and didn’t kill myself out of spite, because I wouldn’t get to see what happens. So after years of being convinced my illness has a physical basis, I found one. A rather small thing, non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

                But it’s not well understood, and has weird connections to behaviour.

                All I know is while I used to laugh at all the “gluten free is a fad” jokes, I now don’t find them funny after understanding just how much influence a simple fucking protein in my diet can have on the functioning of my nervous system. That being the system that houses this consciousness that’s writing to you and not wishing that badly to kill themselves amymore.

                Like did I get help from the systems and people who were supposed to care and help? No. Did they actively act against my best interests by ignoring my pleas for help? Yes they did. Did that make me want to kill myself even more? Yes, it did.

                But did it mean there was no help to be had, anywhere, as an absolute? Seeing how I now feel less like killing myself, seems it doesn’t follow that no help was available. I just had to find it myself, on accident, after literally several decades of complaining about that issue.

                I also chose a therapist who’s not Finnish on purpose, so they understand how the entire culture is affecting me, and I feel validated by them. So while it hasn’t been a huge help, it’s definitely a help going there weekly.

                But perhaps I still don’t belong to those “people in pain” who you speak about who FEEL like there is no help.

      • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I remember a story, of which I don’t know if it is true or not. But basically a man in Japan was sentenced to death for suicide, after a failed attempt.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        But if you fail, you get stuck in a bad place.

        😖

        Also I want to like just take some poison and die. Like an “official” way to do it. I don’t know if I can have the courage to jump off a bridge. And even then, its not 100%. The nearesr bridge near me is like 100 ft in height, not sure if thats enough. People survived Golden Gate and thats even higher.

        Like I wanna one day just wait till my parents yell at me and tell me to “kys” then I just take a poison and die in front of them. I mean like some type of poison that let me just peacefully die, zero pain, 100% guarantee. Like imagine their reaction lol.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Have you considered therapy? Anyway, dying out of spite is not as cool as it might sound. Way too permanent for a one-time punishment.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Jaywalking
    Giving water to voters standing in line
    Punching nazis in the fucking face

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “Oh you support Ukraine, you are a nazi!” punch

      (Who’s gonna determine who is a nazi? I mean, by this logic, we can legalize killing rapists. Then you can go around killing people whom you declare to be a rapist.)

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Punching overt nazis (like assholes that use the salute or wear swastikas in the open), in order to avoid punching innocent people by accident

        • Zier@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m going one step further… shoving nazis into active volcanoes.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If you feel personally attacked by the idea of punching nazis, you’re probably a nazi.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          If you feel personally attacked by the idea of executing a criminal, you are probably a criminal.

          Edit: In fact, everyone who oppose the death penalty are criminals. Therefore, we should execute everyone who opposes the death penalty.

          • superkret@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            See how you replaced punching with executing? That destroys the entire analogy.

            Besides, I don’t feel personally attacked by the idea of executing criminals, I’m opposed to it based on principle, and because it doesn’t even achieve its goals.

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              I don’t mind someone wearing a nazi armband or doing a nazi salute getting punched. I’d probably do nullification if I was on that jury.

              But making a law that says “You are legally allowed to punch nazis” is just disaster. That’s telling people its okay to assault someone that, in their view, is a nazi. Like some karen might perceive being kicked out of a store, as the store manager “being a nazi”.

              It should be up to the juries to nullify if they think the person getting punched is a nazi, not just do a blanket “okay” on “punching nazis”.

              Edit: A better solution is just make it a crime to wear nazi articles of clothing, or doing nazi gestures, or say pro-nazi speeches.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Some banana republic? Or a country like Switzerland that’s probably missing from the list, but not because there aren’t any banned books?

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Not a banana republic. And we simply don’t ban books. Like, some might be banned implicitly because of illegal content, for example a child porn book wouldn’t really fly here, but that’s because of the content, book itself wouldn’t be banned, you would just go to prison for sharing child pornography. I assume I could find other illegal content that would result in an implicit ban.

          But there’s no government body that even can create a list of books that should be banned. Hopefully it stays that way.

        • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You really think it’s common for free countries to ban books. I’m pretty sure my country of Finland (not "some banana republic) does not have any banned books.