Literally whatever he thinks and says, I want the exact opposite. Don’t trust the rich, especially the richest of the rich!!
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places, if you look at it right
Literally whatever he thinks and says, I want the exact opposite. Don’t trust the rich, especially the richest of the rich!!
The world would be so much better off if Trump’s ambitions were confined to Florida
Is this the dude Colin Farrell was designed to be as The Penguin?
You nailed it on the head—if X owns all X accounts, then X should absolutely be held liable and named as codefendants in all past and future litigation where content posted on X is used in the suit. By asserting ownership over the accounts, X is effectively taking on a level of responsibility for the platform’s use and misuse, akin to how a publisher is held liable for the content it distributes.
This raises serious implications for legal accountability. If X claims ownership, they are asserting control, and with control comes liability. They can’t just cherry-pick the benefits of owning the accounts (like monetization, data, and influence) without accepting the risks, including being dragged into lawsuits where harmful, defamatory, or illegal content originates from their platform.
It would also set a precedent for greater accountability in tech. Platforms often hide behind Section 230 protections to dodge responsibility, but if they step forward and say, ‘We own the content or accounts,’ then they lose the shield of neutrality and should face the consequences accordingly. It’s a slippery slope that X might regret going down if this theory gains traction in courtrooms.
I love TLD but have never played the actual game. I just get lost playing survival mode