• lustyargonian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    If status quo means they are independent which they very much appear to me, then isn’t that overwhelming majority support for letting it be the way it is, i.e. not ruled by PRC? If it is ruled by it, then why did PRC bring their vessels to threaten its own people just a month ago?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Status quo is that Taiwan is a province of China that’s not independent. That’s literally why the chart shows the support for becoming independent is practically non existent. If Taiwan was independent then there wouldn’t be a question of it becoming independent. Hope that helps clear up basic logic for you.

      Meanwhile, the real question is why the US still has presence in another country that’s half way across the world from it.

      • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If status quo means that they are a province of China that’s not independent then to whom pertains the “unification”?

        Surely you cannot be posting a graph that implies that there is need for a unification with a country other than our Great People’s Republic of China?

          • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The party is unaware of such claims of autonomy. Posting graphs that imply even remotely that the region of Taiwan is in any way autonomous from our country is westoid propaganda.