• kevin@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The relationship is different though, BMW is not a service provider.

      A better analogy would be the phone company. Is it their job to monitor their customers conversation and determine the legality of what is being said?

      • eskimofry@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I am sure BMW’s TOS has a sentence in there somewhere that they are your daddy once you sign up and this is binding forever. Looks like that means they are a service provider for life.

        Also… isn’t a subscription for heated seats means they provide a live service that we need to pay regularly to maintain?

        • kevin@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          All very true, BMW is a very scummy company lately.

          My argument was that primarily, BMW is a manufacturer of a product. It would be a better analogy to a modem company being sued for the content that was transmitted through their device.

          Side note, I think the feature unlock trend in cars is the worst possible thing.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I could see the Supreme Court rejecting this based on that idea… If you blame the manufacturer, that’s going to open up all manner of gun lawsuits, ammunition lawsuits, etc.