• antihumanitarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Key detail: they’re not dropping it because they’re giving up, the judge dismissed it without prejudice, which means that in 4 years they can pick the case back up. Under a Trump DoJ the case would likely have ended with prejudice, closing it permanently.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        He can’t himself since it’s spelled out in the constitution in the 22nd amendment.

        So tl;dr it would need 3/4 of the states to repeal that. More detail than that, but that’s what it boils down to.