just wondering

    • akkajdh999@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s the point of the original comment and you are bullshitting “how dare you decide what they buy!”. They own the money and they decide that they won’t spend money to improve a homeless person life if it won’t improve it.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The point is to help this person temporarily alleviate a problem they have, whatever that problem may be. If you don’t want to do this, fine, but if you’re only willing to give money if they use that money in ways that you deem wholesome, that’s patronising.

        • akkajdh999@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          help this person temporarily alleviate a problem they have

          And you mean drinking fucking alcohol lmao. Yeah it’s gonna made them feel better for a minute, sure, lol. And fuck them up even worse after that. It’s like giving drugs to drug addicts, wtf.

          in ways that you deem wholesome, that’s patronising.

          No onre said “wholesome”. If so, trying to help honeless people is “patronozing” then generally. Goverment is “partonizing”. Organizations that want to help them are “patronizing”.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The problem is that you are convinced they’re going to buy drugs. You do not know that person, it is not your place to decide that.

            No, I do not agree that simply offering help is patronising.