Todd Bonzalez

Republicans are openly saying that this is their endgame. Trump is nominating the authors for government positions.

They literally put their plans in writing, and now those same people are empowered to start trying to introduce this agenda as legislation.

It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s just a conspiracy.

Let’s just say that decentralized social media lets Japanese users post stuff other mainstream platforms won’t.

So yeah, there’s a lot of lolicon.

One industry can be hiring while another lays off.

It has to go to the highest bidder, and the Sandy Hook parents have all the leverage. $1.4B in leverage.

They can forfeit the entire settlement and sell Infowars to The Onion for $1 if they want to, and that would meet 100% of the settlement. Musk would have to bid $1.4B+1 without the Sandy Hook parents forfeiting a dime if he wants to buy Infowars, and then 100% of that cash goes into the pockets of the Sandy Hook parents who can and will sue again if Infowars says anything defamatory about them or their children ever again.

Why is it weird to take note of when white people murder Black people over petty squabbles? Lynching is a long-standing practice in America, and it’s worth noting that it hasn’t stopped happening.

I see no need to go back over history constantly bringing this shit up.

Bringing what up? The truth?

You might as well say that you don’t see a need to even observe history if you take issue with people discussing the verifiable fact that Newton’s wealth came from slavery.

If anything, it sounds like you might have a vested interest in downplaying information like this. I would be curious to see where your family’s wealth came from.

We kinda do. Trump nearly had Pence hanged by a lynch mob.

You are describing the way deepdream works, not the way modern Diffusion models work. It’s the difference between psychedelic dog faces and a highly adherent generative image of a German Sheppard.

I can’t imagine you’re going to get anything out of this model that actually looks like CSAM, unless there’s some sort of breakthrough in using these models for previously unrealized generative purposes.

No. This is an inference model, not a generative model. You generally cannot train a model for both, unless you do it on purpose, and they certainly did not (especially since inference models are way easier to train than generative models).