The article isn’t saying X% more likely though. It’s saying X% of women who die by homicide are from domestic violence. That sounds bad, but it gives you no actionable information for what this means for homicide or domestic violence as a whole.
It’s really only a way to spread fear that if a woman is going to be killed, it’s likely from domestic violence.
Context is important in statistics, which is why the Mark Twain quote is so popular. An honest article about smoking and cancer is going to say smokers have an 80% higher chance of cancer than non-smokers, showing the relationship between the two groups, not showing how much of a single group falls into a single category.
Focusing on a subset of a subset to get a scary sounding number is a dishonest tactic to get an emotional response rather than a logical one.
It’s generally not worth renouncing. It costs $2350 to do for one. While you have to “pay taxes” it’s mostly just filing paperwork, you don’t pay on your first $126,500 of income, and you can deduct taxes paid to your resident country as well.
Or suicide, but the family has enough influence to get it ruled accidental.
It’s a dishonest representation. It ignores violence against men entirely, and makes it look like women in relationships should expect to be killed.
It is interesting to see the growth from generic fantasy book to international best seller and cultural phenomenon.
Less white people voted for trump in 24 though. The Latino bit is concerning because Democrats believed they had a demographic inevitability, and that appears to not be the case.
Every president since the 70s has overseen genocide, even ignoring the one you’re likely alluding too.
Trump is definitely in the bottom quintile, but also anyone putting him in the bottom 5 is just recency bias.
That fence looks backwards according to the code I’m familiar with, unless you took this inside your neighbor’s yard
It’s downvoted because it’s objectively false. Israel has been attacked since day on in attempt to remove it from the map. If they were to stop fighting they wouldn’t exist. If it weren’t for Palestine constantly fighting, there wouldn’t even be a wall around Gaza.
Maybe we shouldn’t expect every site to default to a global audience, and alter titles as necessary for understanding when exposed to a larger audience.