like Trump and a lot of Pro MAGA people, their trick is to say things that aren’t explicit so they can lie later and say that’s not what they meant.

Gabbard and her defenders will take each individual statement or act without context or predecessor and lie claiming that specific instance doesn’t prove anything. They’ll object to putting them all together to make the tapestry they represent.

I agree that taken each on their own with no context and no history, nothing Gabbard has said or done constitutes evidence of compromise.

But 20 years of her bullshit makes it absolutely clear that she’s either an asset or a straight up agent.

after Gaetz dropped out i told a friend of mine that if I could have only one other person kept from the new administration, it would be Gabbard.

She is absolutely compromised, and it must be very, very deep. Whatever she afraid of, it must be massive.

Either that or she’s actually turned and loves (Soviet) Russia.