I was asking which definition (open having multiple) would apply in the context of the windows OS being open to advertisers

Is this a contradiction? 99% of people are starving farmers who eat dirt for dinner and 1% are chosen from birth to be taught nothing other than how to hack the West

Its not yet, but i can make it be my password*

^{*forawebsiteorappineveruse}

wz6x#HJjt79Wfv

I have seen scam posts

They seem more credible if its by an account with a lot of karma(meaning that they made good comments/posts)

They also downvote any comment talking about the fact that its a scam

I remember seeing bots that downvote comments on scam posts, bots that copy comments from one post to a reposted post(probably by another bot) and, by far the most common, bots that repost popular posts

I meant how that action would make it open for them?

Also, if those actions make it open, would it be open to everyone (if they have money)

By what definition would it be more open to advertisers and data brokers?

For whom would it be the most open operating system?

Would it be more worth it to build more efficient machines or use the less efficient ones to save time?

But do we need to save cybertrucks?

When first reading “a man likes to feel like a man”, i thought it was about trans men

That was what i was asking

One argument i have seen against acknowledging the existence of trans people is that people will be tricked into changing their gender

Its not a good argument, but it exists.

What about the woke mind virus pandemic?

/s

People dont hate trans people just to hate trans people. They have reason, even if they are bad

Not the dangerous radical gender ideology of trying to be happy

Is there any argument for trans people getting their rights removed?

Since people are saying that reality is becoming ridiculous, there should be a newspaper that says believable fake things like “people are treating climate change seriously” or “everyone is wearing masks and quarantining after covid-19 pandemic”