merari42@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agoSignaling that you are a man that can provide for a familylemmy.worldimagemessage-square196fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageSignaling that you are a man that can provide for a familylemmy.worldmerari42@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square196fedilink
minus-squarearchonet@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-217 hours agoI suggest you keep it to yourself next time, then, as you have only furthered the image that vegans are smug asshats who can’t shut the fuck up about being vegan. Maybe that’s what you want though, it’s just a suggestion. c:
minus-square🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·16 hours agoIf u took offence then it proves u are everything they claimed u to be.
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·16 hours agoThat logic is bad and you should feel bad. You suck. If this comment makes you mad, you’re only proving my point /s
minus-squareSunshine (she/her)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·16 hours agoIt is not polite to use ad hominems rather than a logical argument.
minus-squareChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 hours agoThey made an “if/then” statement based on your statement. They attacked the idea, not the person making it. No ad hominem detected.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 hours agoyet you, without evidence, attack your interlocutors as murderers.
I suggest you keep it to yourself next time, then, as you have only furthered the image that vegans are smug asshats who can’t shut the fuck up about being vegan.
Maybe that’s what you want though, it’s just a suggestion. c:
Why are you angered?
Rude comment.
If u took offence then it proves u are everything they claimed u to be.
That logic is bad and you should feel bad. You suck. If this comment makes you mad, you’re only proving my point /s
It is not polite to use ad hominems rather than a logical argument.
They made an “if/then” statement based on your statement. They attacked the idea, not the person making it. No ad hominem detected.
yet you, without evidence, attack your interlocutors as murderers.