Summary

Elon Musk accused Alexander Vindman, a key witness in Trumpā€™s first impeachment, of treason on social media, suggesting he should face ā€œthe appropriate penalty.ā€

Muskā€™s comments followed Vindmanā€™s claims that Musk may have shared sensitive information with Russiaā€™s Putin and used Twitter for disinformation.

Vindman denied the accusations and called Muskā€™s remarks baseless.

Critics condemned Muskā€™s statements as dangerous, especially given his ties to Trumpā€™s incoming administration.

Musk provided no evidence for his claims, reviving past allegations against Vindman of ā€œdual loyaltyā€ rooted in antisemitic tropes.

  • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    1 day ago

    Thereā€™s a general argument - not strictly applicable to you, I donā€™t know you - to be made that a natural-born citizen of a given country is more likely to be loyal to that country than a ā€œforeignerā€, for lack of a better word, and more familiar with its culture and society. It makes sense then that a country would want to restrict their higher public offices to ā€œtheir own peopleā€. (How much those people actually care for the wider body of constituents is a different question, of course.)

    Voting on local politics that influence you more directly isnā€™t the same as participating in federal politics. Musk is essentially a foreign actor, he shouldnā€™t have such influence over the government of a different people.

    (He shouldnā€™t have any influence at all, actually, but Iā€™m just talking about the ā€œtry to change the law so he can run for presidentā€ concern you responded to)