You must log in or register to comment.
Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce 🍇 and🍍?
I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can’t solve that.
“sup” without a “\” belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrödinger’s TeX
🍊 isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
Americans will use anything other than metric
But what if it was grown in Europe?
So to clarify, definitely European and not African?
I don’t know falls to his death
This is bullshit, it defined but didn’t even use the continuous functions 🍇and 🍍.
golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
I can answer the question. No.
Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet they’ll feel real embarrassed about that one when they’re falling asleep years from now.
